D.Canarutto:
Two-spinors, field theories and geometric optics in curved spacetime.
Acta Appl. Math. 62 N.2 (2000), 187-224.
Abstract [to be typeset with Plain TeX]
A partly new approach to 2-spinor geometry, recently developped, turns
out to yield a naturally integrated formulation of Einstein-Cartan and
Maxwell-Dirac fields, and to be suitable for describing several topics,
in field theories, which are relevant to covariant quantization on curved
spacetime. Here, first I present a revised version of the above said geometric
tools and field theory, in which the geometric data consist only of a complex
vector bundle $S \to M$ with 2-dimensional fibres (all needed structures
are functorially derived from $S$; any considered object which is not a
functorial construction is assumed to be a dynamical field). Then I consider
various developments, concerning some features of the electromagnetic gauge
and a partly new covariant description of electroweak geometry and fields.
Finally I examine a 2-spinor treatment of optical geometry and geometric
optics in curved spacetime, leading to a description of the photon field
as a section of the vertical bundle of the bundle of Riemann spheres associated
with $S$.\end
1991 MSC: 81R20, 53C07, 81R25, 83C60, 83C22, 81V15,78A05.
Keywords: two-spinors, connections, tetrad gravity, Maxwell-Dirac
fields, electroweak fields,
optical geometry, geometric optics.
Introduction [to be typeset with Plain TeX]
Recently, A. Jadczyk and I presented a partly new approach to 2-spinors
and Einstein-Cartan-Maxwell-Dirac fields. A first, evident difference with
respect to the standard 2-spinor setting is more or less formal: the basic
concepts are introduced in an intrinsic, coordinate-free way, using precise
algebraic and differential geometric notions which may appeal to a mathematically
oriented reader. A more substantial difference is that the correspondence
between spacetime vectors and Hermitian spinors, rather than being considered
as `adapted' to the spacetime metric representing the gravitational field,
is viewed as the gravitational field itself. Namely, if $S$ is a complex
vector bundle with 2-dimensional fibres, one can formulate a `tetrad-gravity'
approach in which the tetrad is valued in the Hermitian sub-bundle $S\bar\vee\bar
S \subset S\otimes\bar S$, which carries a natural conformal Minkowski
structure ($\bar S$ denotes the `conjugate bundle' of $S$). This makes
it possible to include 2-spinor gravitation in a Lagrangian field theory.
One advantage of this approach is that it yields an integrated and complete
formulation of Einstein-Cartan-Maxwell-Dirac fields by assuming {\it minimal
geometric data}: all the needed geometric structures are derived functorially
from $S$, without fixing any extra background field; if we consider an
object which is not functorially determined from $S$, then it is a dynamical
field of the theory. So, the tetrad is a map $\Theta:TM\to S\bar\vee\bar
S$; a linear connection $C$ on $S$ naturally splits into the gravitational
and electromagnetic parts; the Dirac field $\psi$ is a section of $W:=S\oplus
\bar S^*$ (there is a natural Clifford map $S\bar\vee\bar S \to End(W)$).
Even coupling factors naturally arise as covariantly constant sections
of (tensor) powers of a real line bundle $L$, where $L^2:=L\otimes
L$ is defined to be the Hermitian subbundle of $(\wedge^2S) \otimes (\wedge^2\bar
S)$. This $L$ can be seen as the `space of length units'. An object tensorialized
by some power of $L$ corresponds essentially to a `conformal density' of
the standard 2-spinor setting.
In general I do not assume a given $\epsilon\in\wedge^2S^*$, or a given
Hermitian metric on the fibres of $S$ (by the way, a global fixed $\epsilon$
implies that $\wedge^2S$ is a trivializable bundle, thus ruling out possible
topological effects).
If we translate {\it directly} the standard Einstein-Cartan-Maxwell-Dirac
theory in terms of the above said fields $\Theta$, $C$ and $\psi$, then
we are forced to use $\Theta^{-1}$ (in the standard formulation,
the inverse $g^\#$ of the spacetime metric is essential). However,
it has been suggested that a theory which remains non-singular also when
$\Theta$ is degenerate may be interesting in view of quantization: it would
allow metric signature change, and the degenerate case could be seen as
a geometrical basis for a stochastical approach to quantum theory. From
the mathematical point of view, the non-singularity requirement constitues
a selection criterion which leads to a particularly simple formulation.
In particular we have only first order Lagrangians and equations, according
to the philosophy of the so-called `Kemmer equations' and related approaches.
The first three parts of this paper are devoted to a revised presentation
of the above said results; then I present various developments, including
a partly new description of electroweak geometry and fields. The final
part contains a partly new treatment of optical geometry and geometric
optics in curved spacetime, which aims at a 2-spinor description of photons
suitable for applications to covariant quantum field theory.\end
|